The Role of Writing in Political Science.
ad:
1. I think this paper has a good topic, because not many people know about politic science, as least I have a lot of interests to read this paper for knowing something unfamiliar.
2. This paper have enough resources to support author's points.
3. The ideas are very clear, the author wrote this paper follow a great outline.
dis:
1. Personally, I don't like the focus in this paper, as a people who don't know much about politic science, I still confused about what type of writings people usually use in academic field, what's the special technique they will use in politic science area?
2. The structure can be better. Both academic and non-academic parts using the same narrating mothed, feels a little bit boring.
3. Too abstract, many points should use example to explain or to compare with, but the author didn't.
WRITING AS A CREATIVE WRITER
ad:
1. I admire this paper because it has a really great structure. Divide two main parts into three different perspective as sub-topic.
2. The citation is enough to give this author's points a very strong support.
3. I also think the author chose a good focus on this topic, I was inspired after reading this paper.
dis:
1. Examples are overwhelming. Too much supports makes me feel a little distract.
2. The author didn't have enough personal thoughts. more like a report for the interview but not a interview paper.
3. Sub-topics in this paper seems not very relative with each other.
Writing in the Field of Economics
ad:
1. Correct spelling and grammar.
2. enough pages.
3. references are right.
dis:
1. The formatting is wrong.
2. Too many "I" appears in this paper when it should be objective.
3. The structure is confusing.
THE ROLE OF WRITING IN ENGINEERING
ad:
1. The focus in this paper is great.
2. The author has a very clear thought when writing this paper.
3, good references.
dis:
1. the sub-topic sometimes confused me.
2. language could be more academic.
3. The first paragraph is too long.
WRITING IN THE BUSINESS DISCIPLINE
ad:
1. good structure.
2. clear ideas.
3. enough supports.
dis:
1. no special skills for this area. Instead of saying this is a business writing skill paper, it's more like a regular paper's writing guide.
2. some references are not good enough.
3. The first paragraph started with a inappropriate hook.
Writing in Psychology
ad:
Sorry, I can't find any strength in this paper...
dis:
1. wrong formatting.
2. The hook is too long.
3. paper is too short.
No comments:
Post a Comment